Reduced center of mass acceleration during regular walking with electromyography biofeedback.

BACKGROUND: Regular walking in healthy adults is known to be kinematically stable, but it is unclear how to further kinematically stabilize regular walking. Electromyography biofeedback (EMG-BF) during walking improves walking ability in patients. However, the effect of EMG-BF on walking stability in healthy adults is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether EMG-BF enhances the stability of regular walking in healthy adults. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the EMG-BF enhance the stability of regular walking in healthy adults? METHODS: Auditory biofeedback of single muscle activity was given to twelve participants during regular walking. The target muscles were the ankle plantar flexor, ankle dorsiflexor, and knee flexor. We compared the root mean square of the center of mass acceleration (RMS-CoMacc), which represents walking smoothness, between biofeedback conditions. RESULTS: We found that EMG-BF during regular walking partially reduced the RMS-CoMacc (p = 0.01). In particular, biofeedback of the ankle plantar flexor muscle reduced the RMS-CoMacc in both the anteroposterior and vertical directions. In the mediolateral RMS-CoMacc, no significant difference was found (p = 0.24). SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is novel because it is the first study to reveal the impact of EMG-BF on the stability of walking among healthy adults. It identifies the key muscles for EMG-BF, potentially leading to the development of a more effective EMG-BF system in the rehabilitation. Especially, biofeedback of the ankle plantar flexor muscle could improve walking stability in both the anteroposterior and vertical directions. The effect of EMG-BF for reducing the RMS-CoMacc during regular walking might depend on the target muscles of biofeedback.

Auditory sEMG biofeedback for reducing muscle co-contraction during pedaling.

Muscle co-contraction between the agonist and antagonist muscles often causes low energy efficiency or movement disturbances. Surface electromyography biofeedback (sEMG-BF) has been used to train muscle activation or relaxation but it is unknown whether sEMG-BF reduces muscle co-contraction. We hypothesized that auditory sEMG-BF improves muscle co-contraction. Our purpose was to investigate whether auditory sEMG-BF is effective in improving muscle co-contraction. Thirteen participants pedaled on a road bike using four different auditory sEMG-BF conditions. We measured the surface electromyography at the lower limb muscles. The vastus lateralis (VL) and the semitendinosus (ST) activities were individually transformed into different beep sounds. Four feedback conditions were no-feedback, VL feedback, ST feedback, and both VL and ST feedback. We compared the co-contraction index (COI) of the knee extensor-flexor muscles and the hip flexor-extensor muscles among the conditions. There were no significant differences in COIs among the conditions (p = 0.83 for the COI of the knee extensor-flexor; p = 0.32 for the COI of the hip flexor-extensor). To improve the muscle co-contraction by sEMG-BF, it may be necessary to convert muscle activation into a muscle co-contraction. We concluded that individual sEMG-BF does not immediately improve muscle co-contraction during pedaling.